I agree.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 18:15 > To: Dean Willis > Cc: Hadriel Kaplan; Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); SIP IETF; Dan WING > Subject: Re: [Sip] E.164 - who owns it > > ISTM that pieces of the specs, like tel, aren't implemented > for a couple of reasons: > - they are too hard to implement > - there isn't enough bang for the buck > - its just not understood > > Tel clearly isn't *hard* to implement. That rules out the > first excuse, and for the second implies that there isn't > perceived to be much bang at all, since the bucks are small. > So I expect that either it just isn't understood, or else > there is perceived to be no benefit at all. > > If we can demonstrate that there is value here then it seems > like it should be possible to get implementors to support it. > But maybe I'm being naive. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
