All,

We have updated the document to incorporate feedback received so far.
It now contains a section that helps clarify the motivation.  Let us
know if you have further comments. 

-Stuart

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:48 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth-02
> 
> (As SIP WG cochair)
> 
> This has been raised in the SIP group a couple of times, and we have
not
> yet gained an idea of whether to proceed with it in the SIP WG or not.
> 
> There have been a couple of technical comments raised in the past from
> the security experts; my understanding is that these have now been
> clarified.
> 
> I believe in the past there has been an interested community that says
> this is useful. It has also been clarified that 3GPP would like to use
> it in their specifications.
> 
> So could I ask the WG to look at this document, and formally to
indicate
> whether they believe some work with this scope should be progressed as
a
> SIP WG item.
> 
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth-02.txt
> 
> So if you support it please indicate to the SIP WG chairs.
> 
> If you have technical concerns (i.e. it should not proceed because it
is
> technically flawed beyond fixing) then please ideally mail the list,
> although the SIP WG chairs will also accept input.
> 
> Responses please in 1 calendar week from this date.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
>       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Stuart Hoggan
>       Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 5:15 PM
>       To: [email protected]
>       Subject: [Sip] draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth-02
> 
> 
> 
>       Folks,
> 
> 
> 
>       Based on the feedback received in Philadelphia, we have updated
> draft-dotson-sip-mutual-auth. The changes clarify the usage of the
> Proxy-Authentication-Info header, including support for multiple
values.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       Any further comments or suggestions will be appreciated. It
> would also be nice to obtain WG feedback on pursuing this I-D as a WG
> document.
> 
> 
> 
>       Regards,
> 
>       Stuart
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
> Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to