Hi Robert, On Thu, July 3, 2008 6:32 pm, Robert Sparks wrote: > Please review this carefully. (We really need a _lot_ of people to > think about it, not just a few).
I've been through this draft recently, and it broadly matches up to the changes we have been using successfully for a while now (modulo some implementation details). I only have a few minor comments: Figure 2: This might be a minor typo, or I may have completely misunderstood the draft. Should the state labelled 'Completed' actually be labelled 'Accepted'? 8.4 para 7: The first sentence is a little awkward. It currently contains 'the "Accepted" state, The client' Obvious fixes are either 'the "Accepted" state. The client' or 'the "Accepted" state, the client' but both end up with the sentence sounding a bit clumsy. You could replace the entire sentence with something like this: When in either the "Calling" or "Proceeding" states a 2xx response is received, the client transaction MUST transition to the "Accepted" state, and Timer M MUST be started with a value of 64*T1. The 2xx response MUST be passed up to the TU. Minor typos =========== 7.1 para 2: "transisition" should be "transition" 7.3 para 1: "any response SIP response" should be "any SIP response" Figure 3: "Timer B fired" should be "Timer B fires" (and used to be) 8.10 Timer M: "retranmission" should be "retransmission" Best regards, Michael _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
