Hi Roni,
yes, your understanding is correct.
Cheers,
Gonzalo
Even, Roni wrote:
Hi,
We are looking at doing alternate capabilities as part of
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation-09 using a new attribute
(sescap).
Reading section 5.2 of the body-handling draft , I understand that I
cannot offer a multipart/alternative having two Content-Disposition :
session bodies both with content-type application/sdp. I can have one
‘session’ body with application/sdp and the other with
application/sdp-new which is not SDP for example.
Is that what section 5.2 says?
Thanks
Roni Even
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
