Frank, I agree with you, it looks like a minor bug.
-Rockson -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Shearar Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 5:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip] (Minor) bug in RFC 3264 section 9? Section 9 of RFC 3264 contains Figure 1: v=0 o=carol 28908764872 28908764872 IN IP4 100.3.6.6 s=- t=0 0 c=IN IP4 192.0.2.4 m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0 1 3 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:1 1016/8000 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 m=video 0 RTP/AVP 31 34 a=rtpmap:31 H261/90000 a=rtpmap:34 H263/90000 Figure 1: SDP Indicating Capabilities RFC 4566 (Section 5, page 8) says that t headers come AFTER connection headers. Thus, should this figure not transpose the c & t headers? frank _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
