Cut-and-paste error. On Oct 22, 2008, at 3:56 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
Hi, I have the same question as Paul. Also, I wonder whether the paragraph is needed in the first place. Ithink INFO should follow the normal 3261 procedures as far as CANCEL isconcerned. I also doubt that a UAS would send a 1xx response for an INFO, and without that you can't CANCEL, right? Regards, Christer -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat Sent: 21. lokakuuta 2008 17:46 To: SIP IETF; Eric Burger Subject: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: CANCEL??? I have a question regarding the following paragraph: A UAC MAY CANCEL an INFO request. A UAS receiving a CANCEL for an INFO request SHOULD respond to the INFO with a "487 Request Cancelled" response unless the UAC has already sent a final response. The UAS then MUST ignore future INFO requests. Why would the CANCEL affect *future* info requests??? Paul _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
