Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Robert!
Robert Sparks schrieb:
19% supported SIP over IPSec
What do you mean with "SIP over IPSec"? Every protocol runs over IPSec
as it is transparent to the application.
Well, SIP over IPsec is not really "transparent" to the SIP implementation:
when you want to send a request over an IPSec SA, you MUST be able to
choose what is the source interface / source port and destination
interface / destination port. This is not something so easy to implement
at SIP transport level.
Thomas
I asked where people were taking bits from messages to display as
caller-id.
There were many different kinds of answers, including
P-Asserted-Identity if present, then From
From display name
username part of From uri
P-Asserted-Identity only
Contact uri
Remote IP address
P-Asserted-Identity, then Remote-Party-ID, then From
From, then Remote-Party-ID, then P-Asserted-Identity
So, if the From header is missing ???, the other headers are used?
thanks for the summary
Klaus
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
