Thanks Dean. This was roughly where I wanted to get to in subsequent questions...
>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of ext Dean Willis >Sent: 27 October, 2008 09:13 >To: Juha Heinanen >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'SIP IETF'; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Henry Sinnreich'; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-kuthan-sip-derive > > >On Oct 26, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > >> Hannes Tschofenig writes: >> >>> Given that only 2 out of 50 implementations had support for SIP >>> Identity at >>> SIPit#23 I wonder how urgent the need for anything beyond P- >>> Asserted-ID actually is: >>> https://www.sipit.net/SIPit23_Summary >> >> pai does not help if you receive a request from anywhere on the >> internet. >> > >But in the "real world", nobody uses this stuff on the >Internet, right? It's always proxy-tied, with no interdomain calls. > >So why are we bothering? is it that we THINK interdomain will >really happen with peering agreegements? > >-- >Dean > > >_______________________________________________ >Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip >This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use >[EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip >Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
