Hi John, On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Elwell, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Third, a reminder that there were thoughts expressed in Dublin that we > should capture in a draft considerations about how a UA should handle > received identity information. A first attempt at this is in: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elwell-sip-identity-handling-u > a-00.txt
Thanks for producing this draft. Looking at results from the last SIPit [1], Section 3 (UA best practice for handling received caller identifiers) could represent a valuable work. "I asked where people were taking bits from messages to display as caller-id. There were many different kinds of answers, including P-Asserted-Identity if present, then From From display name username part of From uri P-Asserted-Identity only Contact uri Remote IP address P-Asserted-Identity, then Remote-Party-ID, then From From, then Remote-Party-ID, then P-Asserted-Identity Remote-Party-ID then From From then P-Assertid-Identity P-Asserted-Identity, then Reply-To, then From entire From URI" Of these, using the From display name occurred most frequently, but not much more than any of the other responses [1] https://www.sipit.net/SIPit23_Summary Cheers, -- Victor Pascual Ávila _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
