I was more thinking of a nonce as per Dan's draft. But I don't have a strong opinion.
I am just thinking it's a more appropriate message than the others. > -----Original Message----- > From: Victor Pascual Ávila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 17:00 > To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip] Comment on DERIVE and B2BUAs > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Francois Audet > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Instead of using a SUBSCRIBE or even INFO, it seems > appropriate to use > > OPTIONS. > > > > By definition, OPTIONS is intended to be routed the same way as an > > INVITE, and therefore would be more likly to end-up at the right > > place. > > Do you mean including some dialog information in the > OPTIONS-request (e.g using the Target-Dialog header)? > > Cheers, > -- > Victor Pascual Ávila > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
