I think it defining valid syntax without carefully defining the
corresponding semantics that is the problem. As long as we define both I
don't see it as a problem.
Thanks,
Paul
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Viernes, 28 de Noviembre de 2008, Christer Holmberg escribió:
If there is no technical reason I don't see why we again shall make a
restriction which we later may "suffer" from.
I think the whole SIP protocol is a good example of how a too much permissive
design creates more interop issues than a more restricted design.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
