> -----Original Message----- > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 6:15 AM > > > But, what if the information the piggy-backer wants to send also uses > info packages?
That's illogical, I think. An "Info Package" is inexorably linked to an INFO message context use. A piggy-backer could certainly use the same content-type, with even the same semantics as a package, but it's not an "Info-Package". It's like asking if one can use a RFC 4235 Dialog Event Package with an INFO message. The answer is no - Event Packages are tied to a Subscribe/Notify usage. You could use an "application/dialog-info+xml" body in an INFO I suppose, but you're not actually using/doing the "Dialog Event Package", and you'd have to define an Info-Package for that body type with whatever semantics apply. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
