Dean Willis wrote:
DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
INFO must carry a response.
Putting application-level data into an INFO response is problematic as
this may make the INFO body larger than the transport package size, and
we have no way to reject large responses.
This is exactly why we stalemated on diagnostic responses.
Given the characteristics of SIP-as-transport, the only reasonable thing
to do (beside change SIP) is to require all application-layer responses
use SIP requests in the return direction onstead of piggybacking on the
SIP response. The SIP response can, in general, tells us only about the
handling of the request's delivery at a SIP level, not an application level.
Then I guess we had better stop passing SDP in responses.
Why is it that responses can have a body???
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
