> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:10 AM > I just want it to be clear under what circumstances you can use multiple > body parts in a message, and how a recipient of a message containing > multiple parts figures out how to process it.
Right, so that has two clear aspects to it: 1) Where do we solve it. 2) How do we solve it. I assert that every issue raised so far on this thread with respect to multiple body parts has been equally applicable to most if not all SIP message types. No one has refuted that assertion as far as I can tell. I claim, therefore, that the answer to (1) is: in a separate draft which applies to all messages. Otherwise we run the risk that (a) we don't solve it the same way, and (b) we delay this draft, and (c) we create a case where someone fixes their handling for INFO multi-part bodies but not other message types because they only implemented this draft, and we end up with split UA personality disorder. :) > Just in the thread we have already heard a explanation of doing it based > solely on C-T, which is really wrong. So its obviously not clear now. That is about aspect (2). I agree with you completely that C-T is not the right answer, but I don't see what it has to do with this draft. We shouldn't be defining a solution to the problem for *INFO*. We should be updating INFO to fix what's broken in it now, and defining a solution for all messages in a separate draft (presumably the body-handling draft). -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
