Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:25 PM
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:54 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
I would say it as something like "If the UAS cannot decode the MIME
structure of the body because of formatting errors, it returns a 606.
If the UAS can decode the MIME structure of the body but does not know
what to do with the body parts, either because they are of an
unrecognized type or because there is no application to consume those
body parts, the UAS returns a 415. Otherwise, the UAS delivers the
body part to the application and returns a 200 OK."
I would leave discussion of application-level rejection of body parts
entirely out of the discussion.
Sounds fine with me.
This seems to make it *incorrect* to return any error response in the
case where the content of the body is incorrect. (For instance if the
syntax of the body part is inconsistent with the Content-Type declared
for that part.
While I am ok with *allowing* the UAS to return a 200 in this case, I
think we go too far to say they UAS MUST NOT return an error for this
situation.
OTOH, none of the above is normative language, so perhaps the whole
thing is to be construed as a recommendation or note? I find it very
difficult after the fact to interpret such language. I would rather that
it be very explicit about what is normative and what is not intended to be.
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
