Hi Hadriel, Yes, that is one of the headaches. :)
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of > > Brett Tate > > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 6:26 PM > > To: Vijay K. Gurbani; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Sip] Question regarding conflicting grammar > for IPV6 SIP > > URI andRFC 3986 > > > > Intentional or not, the sip-uri (excluding IPv6reference) > appears to > > not violate extending rfc2396's absoluteURI because the > definition was > > a structured subset of opaque_part. However the introduction of > > brackets to enclose an IPv6 address causes the sip-uri to > no longer be > > a valid absoluteURI (rfc2396) or absolute-URI (rfc3986). > > > > I'm currently not sure if a fix is really needed or how best to > > correct it. Escaping the brackets might work; however that might > > cause more headaches. > > Section 19.1.2 of 3261: > Note that character escaping is not allowed in the host > component of > a SIP or SIPS URI (the % character is not valid in its expansion). > > -hadriel > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
