>it's trying to stop SIP servers being used as DOS amplifiers. If you take this viewpoint, then the fewer servers, the less vulnerability?
Henry On 2/20/09 9:40 AM, "Theo Zourzouvillys" <[email protected]> wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Henry Sinnreich <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Henry, > Making a massive DOS attack on one single UAs does not seem a "productive" > technique for spammers. The problem isn't trying to stop spammers at all, it's trying to stop SIP servers being used as DOS amplifiers. > And if one individual is a valuable target, such individuals have other > communication means besides a sole SIP UA. The victim does not need to be a SIP UA, it could be any IP address at all. ~ Theo
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
