How about: ignorance is bliss? :) Seriously, what does RFC 3986 do?? How does it affect anything for common URI formats not to comply with it? (or really, for *it* not to comply with common URI formats)
-hadriel > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dale > Worley > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:10 PM > To: Dean Willis > Cc: SIP > Subject: Re: [Sip] Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI > andRFC 3986 > > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:03 -0600, Dean Willis wrote: > > I'm afraid I have to concur with Theo. 3986 is just broken. > > Perhaps so, given that the different URI formats have different sets of > acceptable characters -- why would that be? > > But what is the plan for going forward? > > Dale > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [email protected] for questions on current sip > Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
