Hey John, Thanks for reviewing the draft! I was thinking that basically the asserter should decide what it wants to sign, but I think you're right that a default list would be good.
-hadriel > -----Original Message----- > From: Elwell, John [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:29 AM > > An interesting draft, perhaps useful in two ways: first in the way you > intend (as asserter ID in closed domains or federations of closed > domains), but secondly some aspects might be relevant for inclusion in > an eventual solution to the SIP-Identity problem, notably the means of > selecting particular body parts and SDP attributes to sign. > > On that particular issue, I am not sure whether the asserter is in a > position to decide on a request-by-request basis which body parts and > SDP attributes to sign, since it cannot know what downstream entities > are likely to need to do to those fields, so we may need some guidance > (e.g., a default list of things to sign). _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
