On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 09:45 -0400, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > That is why dialog matching should still be done. I have no business > inventing a To-tag for you. It has to be *your* To-tag. If you don't > recognize it then you send me a 481.
Ah, yes, I'd overlooked that out-of-dialog and in-dialog requests are syntactically distinguishable, rather than being distinguished by whether the recipient has previously seen a request with the same call-id. Dale _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
