Hello Ben, Can we say in other words that proxy in such case should indicate used TLS transport by inserting the sips URI in the Record-Route header instead of using transport=tls parameter.
Kind regards, - Tomasz Zieleniewski 2009/8/7 BONNAERENS Ben <ben.bonnaer...@alcatel-lucent.be> > Hello John, > > > Well, I know what this means, but will your average reader > > understand it? I think we are trying to say something along > > the lines that if the transport protocol changes you SHOULD > > use the double Record-Route technique, where the differences > > in transport protocol are reflected in different values of > > the transport parameter (udp/tcp/sctp) and/or different > > values of the URI scheme (sip/sips). Correct? > > Your phrasing could lead to the understanding that we suggest that > only a sips URI can be used to identify the TLS interface which is not > correct. > As the current text suggests, can the TLS interface be identified by any > URI > (sip or sips ; excluding the deprecated transport=tls parameter) that > resolves via RFC3263 procedures to the TLS transport. > > IMHO leaves your suggested phrasing more room for ambiguity > compared to the current text. > > Best regards & thanks, > > Ben. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Elwell, John [mailto:john.elw...@siemens-enterprise.com] > > Sent: donderdag 6 augustus 2009 9:37 > > To: BONNAERENS Ben; sip@ietf.org > > Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix-08 Changes > > > > Well, I know what this means, but will your average reader > > understand it? I think we are trying to say something along > > the lines that if the transport protocol changes you SHOULD > > use the double Record-Route technique, where the differences > > in transport protocol are reflected in different values of > > the transport parameter (udp/tcp/sctp) and/or different > > values of the URI scheme (sip/sips). Correct? > > > > John > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: sip-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:sip-boun...@ietf.org] On > > Behalf Of > > > BONNAERENS Ben > > > Sent: 05 August 2009 15:23 > > > To: sip@ietf.org > > > Subject: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix-08 Changes > > > > > > Hi, > > > version -08 of record-route fix has just been submitted. > > > > > > Change log: > > > - Changed its status from BCP to PS, > > > - Take into account IESG reviews and subsequent comments on the > > > mailing lists, they were summarized in Robert Sparks's document > > > (rrf.txt), so it has been integrated in version -08 with minor > > > refactoring from the authors (me and Ben). > > > > > > The thoughest part was related to the SIP/SIPS question raised by > > > Cullen > > (http://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-sip-record-r > > > oute-fix/c > > > omment/98624/), > > > so here is the text that was added in version -08 to answer this > > > question: > > > "Thus, if the transport protocol changed between its > > > incoming and outgoing sides, the proxy SHOULD use the double > > > Record-Route technique and SHOULD add a transport > > parameter to each > > > of the Record-Route URIs it inserts. With the exception > > that if TLS > > > is > > > used as the transport protocol on either side of the > > proxy, the URI > > > chosen to place in the Record-Route header field value > > reflecting > > > the > > > interface using TLS will need to leverage the [RFC3263] > > mechanisms > > > to > > > indicate that TLS must be used rather attempting to use the > > > deprecated > > > "transport=tls" URI parameter. See [RFC3261] Section 26.2.2 and > > > [I-D.ietf-sip-sips] Section 3.1.4 for more discussion." > > > > > > Brds, > > > Thomas & Ben > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > > > sip-implement...@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use > > > sipp...@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use sip-implement...@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > Use sipp...@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip >
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implement...@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipp...@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
