I don't think SIPp should automatically fail the call.  Based on the 
statistics file, do you know what the failure reason is listed as?

The error log message is actually a warning, as long as you don't jump to 
the end, the call should not be terminated.  Are there any other messages 
in the error log file after this one?

Charles

"K L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/02/2008 11:22:46 AM:

> On 1/2/08, Charles P Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > K L,
> >
> > If you jump to the end of the call SIPp marks it as failed 
automatically
> > (which I think is probably not the best possible behavior), but you 
can
> > easily get around it by doing something like:
> 
> In my case, I don't jump to the end of the scenario:
> 
> - If a BYE is received, I jump to the "next" label (4) to send a 200 OK.
> - If no BYE is received, I jump to the "ontimeout" label (2), to wait
> for another request (non-optional).
> 
> So, in both cases, there is an action made, and I do not jump to the
> end of the scenario.
> 
> >
> > <recv request="BYE" timeout="25000" ontimeout="2" next="4" />
> >
> > ...
> >
> > <label id="2" />
> > <!-- just so we have a scenario element after label 2 -->
> > <nop />
> > <!-- end of scenario -->
> >
> > Charles
> >
> 
> Regards,
> K.L.
> 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/31/2007 09:51:39 
AM:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In a (UAC) scenario, I have the following line, to allow the remote
> > > UA to send a
> > > BYE during the call (after the dialog is established):
> > >
> > > <recv request="BYE" optional="true" timeout="25000" ontimeout="2"
> > next="4" />
> > >
> > > Whether a BYE is received or not, I'd like the call to be considered
> > > as successful.
> > > If no BYE request is received from the remote UA, the call proceeds
> > normally.
> > > The problem is that the call is considered as failed by SIPp 
("receive
> > > timeout on message 10, jumping to label 2").
> > >
> > > Since the recv is marked as "optional", it seems strange to me that 
SIPp
> > > considers the jump to label 2 as an error. Is there an option to 
change
> > this
> > > behaviour ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > K.L.
> > >
> > >
> > 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sipp-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
> >
> >


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to