Did you try with -m 1 (for just 1 call)??? Your scenario seems fine with
me...

2010/3/9 Kwame Wright <[email protected]>

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to simulate periodic registration messages from a finite number
> of users. My scenario looks like this:
>
> <label id="1"/>
> <send>
>     <![CDATA[
>
>       REGISTER sip:[remote_ip] SIP/2.0
>       Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port]
>       To: <sip:[[email protected]:[remote_port]>
>       From: <sip:[fiel...@[remote_ip]:[remote_port]>
>       Contact: <sip:[fiel...@[local_ip]:[local_port]>;transport=[transport]
>       Expires: 1
>       Call-ID: [call_id]
>       CSeq: 2 REGISTER
>       Content-Length: 0
>
>     ]]>
>   </send>
> <recv response="200">
> </recv>
> <pause milliseconds="5000" next="1"/>
>
>
> I tried using the -m option to limit the number of calls to the number of
> users I have. After the pauses, sipp seems to get confused and starts
> spitting out packets indefinitely without the pausing. Any idea on what I
> may be doing wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Kwame Wright
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Sipp-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to