Please,
post the replies back to the forum, as others might be able to help and/or
benefit from the conversation.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Tim King <[email protected]> wrote:
> Many people ask me for a wireshark trace so that was what I attached int he
> pdf.
Terrible way to investigate SIP problems. You should send the pcap instead:
with the PDF you cannot get graphs for the messages and also whatever
generated the PDF is unnecessarily verbose (no need for all that parsing).
> The specific problem is it does not place the call it seems to get into a
> loop of 407 proxy auth required.
>
Show the command line your are using and the SIPp output for a single call
(-m 1).
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:53 AM, mayamatakeshi <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Tim King <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone please tell me if they see what is wrong with this scenario
>>> file. I have attached the Scenario as well as a wireshark trace of the test.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think you will get much help throwing a 34-pages PDF at the forum.
>> Nobody will look into it.
>> You better try to understand your problem from SIPp output and log files
>> and come up with more specific questions.
>>
>> br,
>> takeshi
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
