Wonderful! Thanks again!

On 8/24/2011 11:31 AM, mayamatakeshi wrote:


On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Doug Beach <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    takeshi,

    Thank you, between what you had said and talking to my coworkers
    today, I was able to figure out my error.

    I have another question. I was looking here:
    
http://sipp.sourceforge.net/doc/reference.html#Structure+of+client+%28UAC+like%29+XML+scenarios,
    at the keyword list, specifically at the [remote_port] keyword. I
    am confused with the description, I can pass in the Remote IP port
    on the command line OR add an offset [remote_port+3]. The offset
    part is in the code correct?


I actually never used this combination of remote_port+offset. But yes, the offset is set in the scenario file.

    The offset isn't entered at the command line, right?


Correct.

    The tester just types in what remote port to communicate with just
    like how the Remote IP address is entered.


             this the remote IP address
                                    |         this is the remote port
                                    |               |           local IP
| | | local port | | | |
    sipp -sf test.xml 10.0.47.34 5061 -i 10.0.47.40 -p 5060

    Correct?


Not quite. The naming is right but you must put a colon between remote_ip and remote_port.

    Just type in the remote IP and remote port? There are no options I
    need to include?


The first lines of "sipp -h" shows this:

  Usage:
    sipp remote_host[:remote_port] [options]

So you should call it like this:
sipp -sf test.xml 10.0.47.34:5061 <http://10.0.47.34:5061> -i 10.0.47.40 -p 5060

Obs: however I usually put all options before the required parameters, like this: sipp -sf test.xml -i 10.0.47.40 -p 5060 10.0.47.34:5061 <http://10.0.47.34:5061>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K
The only unified storage solution that offers unified management 
Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. 
Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to