Hi Takeshi,

Thanks for your quick response.
I am running SIPp3.2.

The full scenario is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>

<!-- Start Line and CSeq Method Mismatch   -->

<scenario name="CALLCDNSM_ver1">

  <send retrans="500">
        <![CDATA[
                OPTIONS sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0
                To: sip:[email protected]
                From: sip:[email protected];tag=34525
                Max-Forwards: 6
                Call-ID: mismatch01.dj0234sxdfl3///[call_id]
                CSeq: 8 INVITE
                Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=[branch]
                l: 0
        ]]>
  </send>

  
  <!-- Recveive Response 400 Bad Request -->
  <recv response="400">
        <action>
                <log message="[timestamp] -  Call-ID [call_id]:  - 400 Bad 
Request"/>
        </action>
  </recv>

</scenario>



In then send command there is a deliberate mismatch between
the OPTIONS and the INVITE so the receiving element will respond with a 400 bad
request.


Thanks,
M


Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:06:22 +0900
Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] while expecting '400' (index 1), received 'SIP/2.0 
400 Bad Request
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]



On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Michelle Kearney <[email protected]> 
wrote:









Hi,



I am new to SIPp. I have a call scenario set up where I send an invalid message
and expect to receive a "400 Bad request".



This "400 Bad request" is received by SIPp but is seen as an
unexpected message and the call is aborted:

"while expecting '400' (index 1), received 'SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request"



The xml scenario for the 400 response is:

  <recv response="400">

        <action>

               
<log message="[timestamp] -  Call-ID [call_id]:  - 400 Bad
Request"/>

        </action>

  </recv>



How can this 400 bad request be handled better so the call is not aborted. I 
have tired several way and am having no joy.

I did a quick test here with SIPp version svn590 and I am not able to reproduce 
this. 

Please check which version you are using as it could be a bug in a older 
version.

Other than that, maybe there is an error in the xml file. Please show us the 
full scenario.

regards,
Takeshi.
 

                                          
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Sipp-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users

Reply via email to