On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 14:36 -0300, Tony Graziano wrote: > I do think it is necessary fro sipXbridge to "strip" digits on incoming > calls from the ITSP if desired. > > I notice some ITSP's add prefixes to incoming calls to help them bill > the calls, and these prefixes get passed into the sipX CDR. This means > there has to be aliases for each DID and the CDR are not "natively" > numbered. > > If sipXbridge could strip these off before sipx processed them, there > would be no need to adjust any of the typical sipX settings. This would > be an example of why stripping digits at sipXbridge would be useful > (IMO).
The most important case is when you have more than one call source, and different sources add different prefixes -- it's possible that the same digit string could appear from different ITSPs, and yet have to be stripped *differently* depending on the source. I suppose it's rare for such an accidental collision of prefixes, but without being able to control stripping based on source, it would be horrible to deal with. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
