On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:30 PM, M. Ranganathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Damian Krzeminski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> M. Ranganathan wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> Sipxbridge is really two independent services - media relay and >>> signaling. Currently, sipxbridge waits for sipxbridge.xml to appear in >>> /etc/sipxpbx before it actually starts running. So in a fresh install, >>> it will wait and do nothing until you have configured a >>> sipxbridge.xml. This necessitates you to actually configure it before >>> it starts running. We should change that. A dummy sipxbridge.xml >>> should be installed. This need contain nothing other than a port >>> range. >>> >> >> If sipXbridge is really 2 different services maybe it would be better if it >> actually was split into 2 independent and independently configured services. >> Tricks with installing "default" version of sipxbridge.xml are going to >> backfire sooner or later (upgrade problems come to mind). > > > Actually that is not quite correct ( my error for bad explanation ) . > Sipxbridge is dependent upon media relay but not vice versa. Does it > really matter to you if they run as two independent processes? I dont > mind if the configuration has to be read from two different files but > when we had this discussion at the start of the project you wanted to > combine them into a single file. On the other hand it makes life > easier for me if sipxbridge and the media relay run as an independent > process.
Sorry... On the other hand it makes life easier for me and more efficient if they do NOT run as independent processes. So long as sipxbridge + relay export the right functionality what does it matter? Please feed me as many xml files as you wish. > > > >> >>> I do think that the port range information in sipxbridge.xml should be >>> displayed somewhere independent of the sbc configuration. >> >> Much easier to achieve if media relay was independent from SBC >> functionality... > > Why? > > As you are in the business of writing xml files, please write two > independent xml files and let the implementation of the relay and > bridge do what it needs to do. Do you care if I run the relay in a > thread or a process or as two independent processes? That is an > implementation choice that does not affect anything else. > >> >> [...] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev >> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev >> > > > > -- > M. Ranganathan > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
