On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 14:28 -0400, Jeremy Geras wrote: > Reading about the "+sip.rendering" parameter in RFC 4235, I'm not sure > the UA on the receiving end of this can really assert that they are > being put on hold. It has more to do with whether or not the UA > sending it is rendering the media it is receiving, doesn't it?
That's true, although in that regard, it's identical to "a=sendonly", which only really says that the sender is not rendering any media it receives. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
