When I submit the alarm system code, there will be a slight change in
functionality around the process notifications from the Watchdog.
Whereas now a separate notification method and list of contacts can be
configured for each process (in the process.d/<process>.process.xml
files), this will be replaced by calls to
raiseAlarm("PROCESS_RESTARTED", processAlias) and
raiseAlarm("PROCESS_FAILED_RESTART") in MonitoredProcess.cpp. If
enabled, then emails will be sent to the system's configured list of
contacts, for all monitored processes. I could achieve almost the same
functionality by defining one alarm for each process, but this did not
seem necessary to me. Does anyone disagree?
At the moment, I have emails disabled for the PROCESS_RESTARTED one, and
am only sending emails if the process fails restart, but this will be
configurable and I can change the defaults if people want.
Does the slight loss in flexibility in having a single list of contacts,
vs a list per process, concern anyone? I do not plan to make the list
of contacts configurable for each alarm.
Thanks,
Carolyn
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
