Woof! On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:46:02 -0400, Paul Mossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about I update the code comment to cite XECS-1706 and explain why 4 > is used instead of 1. Is that a good comprimise? Yeah, that's good enough. Also mention that it is a "quick fix" and is supposed to go away. I'm sure 5 years from now, someone will see that "quick fix" and chuckle over how it is still in there for yet another borked phone. --Woof! _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
