> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Steinmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 8:30 AM
> To: Picher, Michael; Robert Joly; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [sipX-dev] User-based gateway selection feature proposal
> (XECS-415)
> 
> >
> >To: Joly, Robert (CAR:9D30); [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] User-based gateway selection feature proposal
> >(XECS-415)
> >
> >Robert,
> >
> >This is exactly what I was looking for when feature request was made.
> >
> >Also, while it wasn't in the initial feature request, I think the
> option
> >code is great to have in there for the roaming user scenario.  This
> >feature will also have huge benefits in a testing/debugging scenario
> >where the Admin may want to test calling from a particular location.
> 
> I can see the value of DTMF activated routing as a debugging tool. We
> should make sure that the DTMF feature code can be activated /
> deactivated from the admin UI.
> 
> How does this work with Caller ID? We can set caller ID by user and by
> gateway. How does this work with calls that go out a local gateway in
a
> branch office?  Wouldn't the roaming user have to use a DTMF feature
> code to route the call through his/her home gateway in order to get
> that
> local Caller ID?  In cases that is important, the DTMF feature code
> would have to be used in order to override the auto-detected current
> location.
> 
> The auto-detection of the current location of a roaming user is very
> powerful.
> 
> Location: In sipXconfig we are assigning a location to a user and not
> to
> a phone, correct?  The phone then takes the location of the user
> assigned to it. In addition, we assign a location to a gateway. Would
> like to make sure I understand this correctly.
> 
> --martin
> 

[Picher, Michael] 

I would think the gateways would be assigned to the location and not the
location to a gateway....

> 
> 
> >
> >As others have suggested, I believe this needs to be on a per dial
> plan
> >basis.  The admin may want LD calls to route totally different than
> >local calls.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >   Mike
> 

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev

Reply via email to