On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 14:44 -0500, Arjun Nair wrote: > Or else, we could just have sipXconfig answer the challenge. I am > leaning towards this method, as it would make the system more secure.
I can see that eventually we will want to require authentication for messages that cause reboots, so we might as well start building the infrastructure to do so. (It does not appear to be much more work than any other solution.) Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
