On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:13 AM, M. Ranganathan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 7:59 PM, M. Ranganathan <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Melcon Moraes <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, Ranga. >>> >> >>> Does all this make any sense? >> >> >> Yes it does. I will look at my code. There is possibly a bug. > > > Check out revsion 14358 I fixed an issue which will address this > problem you observed. The P-Asserted-Identity header will now contain > the ID that the ITSP wishes to see ( it was previously put in the > From: header as well -- which was the bug you ran into). > > The From: header will pass through unmodified. > > Thanks for catching it. >
Very nice Ranga. I'll give it a try. Thank you. Regarding the other issue, I do use sipxconfig to configure sipxbridge. I was just copying/pasting the corresponding generated part to the option on the GUI and I did it wrong. I pasted the registration part, when what I meant was to paste the one said at the e-mail before. In short, the behaviour is the same, whether I check the "Use public address for call setup" or not. Do you need more info on that? -MM > > Ranga > > >> >> >>> >>> -MM >>> >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know if you need more info. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance for your time. >>>>> >>>>> -MM >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sipx-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev >>>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> M. Ranganathan >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> M. Ranganathan >> > > > > -- > M. Ranganathan > _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
