----- Original Message ----- From: "voice" <[email protected]> To: "Scott Lawrence" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:02 PM Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Installing 3.11.x
> Hi Scott > > Just read the link below. This is a "Big How a Bonga " as Boszo the Clown > would have said. > > So sipXbridge can only install and run on a singal NIC that must be a Public > ipaddr. Unless you did not understand my question. > > How else is sipXbridge going to reach the ITSP(sip trunking)? > > r > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Lawrence" <[email protected]> > To: "voice" <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 9:41 AM > Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Installing 3.11.x > > > > On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 11:33 -0600, voice wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I will install into test Centos5 box. 3.11.x from svn and install on a > dual > > > nic box. > > > > > > By default > > > eth0 is public(56.19.x.x) and > > > eth1 is private (192.168.10.2) == sipX. gateway 192.168.10.1 netmask > > > 255.255.0.0 > > > > This configuration is not recommended. See > > > > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Redundant_network_interfaces > > > > > hostname of box is sipx.ssss.net, which is public DNS domain and > associated > > > to eth0. > > > > > > 1. How does sipX distinguish between the 2 NIC's at intallation time? > > > > The current setup scripts will use only eth0. Putting SIP devices on > > the other network may or may not work at all (this depends in part on > > the other SIP devices and how you have routing configured on that > > network). > > > > > 2. After downloading from sipX and creating SSL does sipX default to > > > hostname of box, which is a public domain. Does this make sense when > sipX > > > is running in the boxes private space. OR should sipX not be installed > on > > > dual NIC box and use only 1 NIC with public address. > > > > > > 3. Does sipX need to have the DHCP server running to function when in > fact > > > all registration well be remote registration. On this box no local > nodes. > > > > Some diagnostics may complain if there is no DHCP, but it should work as > > long as the phones are happy. > > > > > 4. When installing sipX using svn what is the relationship between eth0 > and > > > sipX domain name used when configuring sipX > > > > > > Does 3.11.x still need the config.defs to function? > > > > It won't when it's done... not quite there yet, I believe > > > > > _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
