On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Chaitra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > This is regarding a Multi SIP Trunk Gateway scenario with the following > configuration: > > We have 2 Bandwidth.com directory numbers 9497776945 and 9497776946. > > Setup: > ------ > 1. Create a SIP trunk (1) , with the 1st directory number 9497776945 > specified as the Caller ID on the 'Caller ID' screen > 2. Create a SIP trunk (2) , with the 2nd directory number 9497776946 > specified as the Caller ID on the 'Caller ID' screen > > 3. Create a custom dial plan to dial out through SIP trunk (1) as ---> > Prefix 00 and 'Any number of digits' , Resulting call dial, + and append > 'matched suffix' , Assign SIP trunk (1) as gateway > > 4. Create a custom dial plan to dial out through SIP trunk (2) as ---> > Prefix 500 and 'Any number of digits' , Resulting call dial, + and append > 'matched suffix' , Assign SIP trunk (2) as gateway > > Now from an SCS user, > Case1: dial 500 followed by 919886216883-----> the caller id displayed on my > PSTN phone is 9497776946 > > Case2: dial 00 followed by 919886216883----->the caller id displayed on my > PSTN phone is again 9497776946 (this should have been 9497776945)
Hi Chaitra, Do you have the Caller-ID set up correctly? If so, it should pick up the right account. For bandwidth.com the caller Id should be usern...@public-address. Each trunk gateway should of course have a different caller-id. If you have configured correctly, the intent is that the right account will be used. If not, there is a bug. Please file an issue and attach a log with DEBUG enabled ( and also turn on fine logging in log4j.properties ). I can look at the logs then and get a better idea if this is a problem. Thanks Ranga > > That is, the Caller id of the latest added SIP trunk is displayed on the > PSTN phone irrespective of the dial plan used to dial the PSTN number. In > XECS-1685 (Multi Sip Trunk Gateway support is needed from same > ISP/provider) the closing comments say "this seems to be intent: SipXbridge > simply uses the first account that matches domain if it cannot find one with > specific clid " > > Also if this is the case , wont the wrong account be billed each time a call > is made with the setup mentioned above? Please correct me if I am wrong. > > In Case2, also checked the logs to verify the account through which the call > was placed. This says, > Original-From: \"301\" <sip:[email protected]>;tag=B5E00800-AD8104BF > Aliased-From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=B5E00800-AD8104BF > > > Thanks in advance, > Chaitra > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
