On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:11 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 08:56 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote: > > This isn't really correct, I think. > > > > Having freeswitch installed is not a build-time dependency - it's a > > run-time dependency. This test caused some build failures last night > > because freeswitch is not on the build servers, but it's not really > > needed for the build. > > > > I think that test should be moved to a configuration test that's run by > > whatever needs it at 'configtest' time. > > Except that sipXconfig and sipXfreeSwitch need to know FREESWITCH_CONFIG > to substitute in these files: > > sipXconfig/build.properties.in > sipXfreeSwitch/etc/logrotate.d/freeswitch.in > sipXfreeSwitch/bin/freeswitch_setup.sh.in > sipXfreeSwitch/bin/freeswitch.sh.in > > And for all the third-party libraries, we set up the > location-configuration variables by verifying where the library is on > the machine doing the building.
I think it would be better to make the configure-time behavior to be a warning that the default location has been assumed, along with a run-time test that checks that assumption. I changed the behavior of all the sipX* library and header searches to do this some time ago. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
