On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 16:06 +0100, Gabor Paller wrote: > I still wonder, however, whether sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port should be two separate users.
Given that sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 and sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:15060 can easily route to different instances of sipX, they have to be considered separate users. I've actually run 5 separate instances of sipX on one host, and it works just fine. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
