I think if you used the internal DNS, and added aliases to the IP address in sipxconfig, it would work much better. None of your UA's would necessarily "have to us" the SRV records, and you will have lots less problems with services on the sipx side of things.
=================================== Tony Graziano, Operations Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8428 Fax: 434.984.8429 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LAN/Telephony Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Online Systems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/27/08 18:35 PM >>> Hello, I recently downloaded the most recent stable ISO of SipX/CentOS. Everything installs fine when I don't install DNS, NTP, or DHCP servers. Where the setup asks for a FQDN for the server I enter sipx.myfqdn.com. I don't change any DNS records to reflect any changes, the alias is correctly configured as the private IP address of the SipX server and phones register and make calls just fine inside the private network. The question in the back of my mind is am I doing something wrong by not using DNS that will come back to bite me? Ideally I would like to use nothing but private and public IP addresses to configure the SipX server and not have to deal with DNS at all. Is there a way to do this safely? When 4.0 comes out (the beta does not work for me at the moment, the NAT traversal rules fail out on startup) I would like to have this option and not have to worry about DNS at all and use the bridge in the SipX server: Mobile User <-> GSM GW w/ Static Private IP <-> SipX Server w/ Static Private IP <-> Firewall w/ External Static Public IP <-> SIP Trunks w/ Static Public IP I did experience a problem with not being able to access the SipX server when I enabled NTP server in setup. It seemed a certificate was being mangled in some way which then prevented access to the web interface upon reboot. Has anyone else run into this? I'll be testing SipX out with a few different brands of GSM gateways, I don't see why they wouldn't work just fine. SipX just seems to be so clean when compared to other alternatives out there and is easy to setup. Though not a software developer (the closest I get is interface design) I do appreciate all the efforts by the contributors. Thanks for offering such a good piece of software to the community. -- Josh -- Joshua Campbell President Online Systems 232 Ridge Road Valencia, PA 16059 Tel: 412.894.9930 Fax: 724.625.3710 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.onsys.ws/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
