On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 17:07 +0000, Gabor Paller wrote: > Please, note that in the second 202 Accepted returned by SipX, the > second To tag is missing (the dialog was set up correctly in case of the > first 202 Accepted and that the Expires in the second 202 is not 0 but a > higher number. The NOTIFY returned after the second 202 has "active" > subscription state instead of having a terminated subscription state. > > What do I do wrong?
I am sure that what you have discovered is that sipXpublisher does not handle "Expires: 0" correctly. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
