On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 08:59 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > >>> On 4/24/2009 at 8:54 AM, in message <1240577655.6354.31.ca...@scott>, > >>> "Scott > Lawrence" <scott.lawre...@nortel.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 08:35 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > > > > > We have a heavy parked call usage. We find we have to do this twice > > > weekly, or after 4 business days we start seeing that parks stop > > > working and it manifests itself that you can park calls, but not > > > retrieve them which is VERY painful. > > > > Which version are you seeing that with? There have been a lot of fixes > > made to the park server (and the call library it's built on) late in the > > 3.11/4.0 stream... > > > > > > > > 3.10.3. It's not feasible for us to try 4.0 until it's stable by you, and > then stable and supportable in house. It's a big version change after all. We > have 4.0 in a lab here, but still waiting to get a few things worked out > before we start planning for what's new and improved and actually use it, > testing the upgrade, etc. > > Glad to hear of the fixes though. >
3.10.3 has a work-around for the leakage problems known at that time. A cleanup function runs regularly and should clear out leaked objects once they are an hour old. I'd be interested to see a debug log of the park server when the bad behavior is happening. thanks, -Kathy _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
