Hi Tony, Thanks for your help, i really appreciate it. I already played with the iso based distro in a virtual machine where i used the physical box i'm now trying on as a secondary / gateway. I had a few problems there, too but foun that i should move on. In the end, on the first release, we actually want to find some issues to be able to nail them eventually :) Greetings, Michael
-----Original Message----- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Sonntag, 31. Mai 2009 04:09 To: Michael Siebecker; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No process serves port 5060 I really suggest if you are getting your feet wet you start with the ISO installer. I suspect there are a lot if things missing based on your output of sipxproc --state. You should have: {"FreeSWITCH"=>"Running", "sipXmrtg"=>"Running", "SIPRegistrar"=>"Running", "ParkServer"=>"Running", "ConfigAgent"=>"Running", "CallResolver"=>"Running", "ACDServer"=>"Running", "SIPStatus"=>"Running", "ConfigServer"=>"Running", "CallResolver-Agent"=>"Disabled", "SipXbridge"=>"Running", "MediaServer"=>"Running", "sipXivr"=>"Running", "PageServer"=>"Running", "PresenceServer"=>"Running", "ResourceListServer"=>"Running", "SipXrelay"=>"Running", "SIPXProxy"=>"Running"} Seriously, the ISO is an excellent way to start and saves so much time. You can always wipe and start over after you get the hang of the basics with sipXecs. -Tony >>> "Michael Siebecker" <mich...@jsoconsulting.ch> 05/30/09 6:28 PM >>> Indeed. The wiki only mentions yum install sipxecs Do i need more packages that sipxecs and sipxproxy ? -----Original Message----- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Sonntag, 31. Mai 2009 00:20 To: Michael Siebecker; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No process serves port 5060 You didn't install all the packages via yum. The proxy is not installed or the role is not assigned. -----Original Message----- From: "Michael Siebecker" <mich...@jsoconsulting.ch> To: <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> Sent: 5/30/2009 6:12:44 PM Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No process serves port 5060 Thanks for your assistance... I installed on centos 5 series using yum using sipxecs stable. I restart all services when necessary, and also tried restart of sipxecs service as a whole. [r...@aao3 ~]# sipxproc --state {"ParkServer"=>"Running", "ConfigServer"=>"Running", "SipXbridge"=>"Running", "PresenceServer"=>"Running", "ResourceListServer"=>"Running", "SipXrelay"=>"Running"} [r...@aao3 ~]# Selinux is disabled Iptables are empty, all policies accept. There's no process claiming 5060 neither UDP nor TCP. My testphone not being able to register triggerd my attention on it. Tcpdump showed me ICMP replies that the service is not available. Searching more i found the same process listening on 5080 and 5090. For 5080 i know it's configured for external access, 5090 didn't ring a bell to me. Grepping 5090 in /etc/sipxpbx pointed me to [r...@aao3 sipxpbx]# grep 5090 * sipxbridge.xml: <local-port>5090</local-port> Seems incorrect to me, but cannot verify and no idea how to change it through the webinterface. A manual test, setting it to 5060 and restarting the whole service moved, as expected that service from 5090 to 5060, but the phone still could not register getting rejected on "REGISTER sip:<sipdomain.replaced>" by "SIP/2.0 405 Method not allowed". Where i wonder if "REGISTER sip:<sipdomain.replaced>" should not be "REGISTER sip:<exten...@sipdomain.replaced>" or similar. In any case it didn't work so i reverted my manual change for local port to: <local-port>5090</local-port> Thanks again. -----Original Message----- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Samstag, 30. Mai 2009 23:53 To: Michael Siebecker; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No process serves port 5060 Sounds like an incomplete configuration. How did you install it? (source, yum, ISO)? Do any of the services need to be restarted from sipXconfig? from the cli do sipxproc --state Everything should be running except CallResolver-Agent. Certain other functions would not be running if you didn;t assign the server that role (ACD, etc.). Do you have selinux or iptables running? To see what process id claims the port fuser -n udp 5060 ex: 5060/udp: 6766 this will give you the process id then ps -p 6766 PID TTY TIME CMD 6766 tty1 00:00:50 sipXproxy All of the above examples are linux commands, not sipxspecific (that's my term!). I think you need to look at your sipx server, services and see if they are running, and provide some more information. Can you register a phone? Can you login to sipXconfig? The more information you can provide, the more assistance and replies from the list you will get paduan (I sayeth in a yoda voice, and yes, I CAN sound just like him. My kids get creeped out sometimes). -Tony >>> "Michael Siebecker" <mich...@jsoconsulting.ch> 05/30/09 5:08 PM >>> Hi all. Using sipxecs 4.0 i now have a case where the server doesn't offer access to ports 5060 (no process claims it). Where should i look for reasons or log information? Thanks. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
