On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Picher,
Michael<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, I sent you a snapshot...  sipxbridge won't start at all now with
> the patch applied.


You should apply the patch with the system shut down. Once you have
applied the patch, you cannot shut it down from the GUI. You will need
to find the sipxbridge processes and kill them independently or you
can reboot your sipx machine. Did you shut down the sipxbridge
instances manually?

Ranga.


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 10:54 AM
> To: Picher, Michael
> Cc: Tony Graziano; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipxbridge question...
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Picher,
> Michael<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Nope...  same problem...
>
>
> It will not appear in the drop down for SBC if that is what you were
> expecting to see. That is a 4.1 feature we are working on.
>
> Was there another problem?
>
> Ranga
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Picher,
>> Michael
>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:52 AM
>> To: Tony Graziano; [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipxbridge question...
>>
>> Ah...  I'll give that a whirl.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tony Graziano [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:32 AM
>> To: Picher, Michael; [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipxbridge question...
>>
>> I think sipxbridge needs to be shut down before the patch can be
> applied
>> properly.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Picher, Michael" <[email protected]>
>> To: M. Ranganathan <[email protected]>
>> Cc:  <[email protected]>
>>
>> Sent: 8/24/2009 6:57:29 AM
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipxbridge question...
>>
>> Hey Ranga,
>>
>> I applied that patch to a fresh 4.0.1 box and an upgraded (from
> 3.10.3)
>> 4.0.1 box... This is coming up...
>>
>> sipXbridge was running before the patch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>        Mike
>>
>> Standard error
>>
>>    * SipXbridge : Exception caught while running
>>    * org.sipfoundry.sipxbridge.SipXbridgeException: Exception starting
>> web server
>>    * at
>>
> org.sipfoundry.sipxbridge.SipXbridgeXmlRpcServerImpl.startXmlRpcServer(S
>> ipXbridgeXmlRpcServerImpl.java:134)
>>    * at org.sipfoundry.sipxbridge.Gateway.start(Gateway.java:1007)
>>    * at org.sipfoundry.sipxbridge.Gateway.main(Gateway.java:1362)
>>    * Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use
>>    * at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method)
>>    * at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.bind(PlainSocketImpl.java:359)
>>    * at java.net.ServerSocket.bind(ServerSocket.java:319)
>>    * at java.net.ServerSocket.<init>(ServerSocket.java:185)
>>    * at javax.net.ssl.SSLServerSocket.<init>(SSLServerSocket.java:106)
>>    * at
>>
> com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLServerSocketImpl.<init>(SSLServerSocketI
>> mpl.java:106)
>>    * at
>>
> com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLServerSocketFactoryImpl.createServerSock
>> et(SSLServerSocketFactoryImpl.java:72)
>>    * at
>> org.mortbay.http.SslListener.newServerSocket(SslListener.java:257)
>>    * at org.mortbay.util.ThreadedServer.open(ThreadedServer.java:477)
>>    * at
>>
> org.sipfoundry.sipxbridge.SipXbridgeXmlRpcServerImpl.startXmlRpcServer(S
>> ipXbridgeXmlRpcServerImpl.java:79)
>>    * ... 2 more
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>        Mike
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 12:05 PM
>> To: Picher, Michael
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipxbridge question...
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Picher,
>> Michael<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Grr...  I've got a fresh 4.0.1-015823 install, sip trunking service
> is
>>> enabled, re-sent the profiles and I can't get sipXbridge-1 to appear
>> in the
>>> Internet calling drop down.
>>
>>
>> Are you looking for making sipxbridge-1 an SBC for internet calling ?
>> If so I believe it is only enabled in 4.1. There are some issues open
>> against that too.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Ranga
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What's the trick or is this a bug?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>   Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> M. Ranganathan
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> M. Ranganathan
>



-- 
M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to