On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:36 PM, li...@grounded.net <li...@grounded.net>wrote:
> > when you ran opensbc IT was the NAT traversal device instead of pfsense > > is all. > > One very big difference is that now I'm using pfsense, which is a firewall. > The only > option I seem to have is pfsense in multi wan setup since sipx can only > have one default > gateway. Unless of course, I might be able to run multiple sipx boxes in > sync mode. > > > There are two ways. CARP=dedicated interface from pfsense to pfsense. > Multi- > > wan (one pfsense box)=has to be configured with "sticky" connections so > > when a transaction or session starts it stays there until it's terminated > > or until the box goes away. DNS would be able to "load" balance this with > > identical priorities. > > That would work. I basically want to put my WAN connections to good use by > balancing. > > Only the services unique to that server are gone, whether master or > > distributed. Registrations will failover. Voicemail (at present) will > not. > > This was never clear to me until now. As I understood it, if the master > goes, everything > goes. In reality, if the master goes, everything keeps going, you bring the > master back up > and you have control again as well. > Pretty much, they are enhancing HA with every version. > > > Presently voicemail resides on the server the account is assigned to when > > it is setup. > > I guess that kills my question about running two systems, synched up. > > For now for voicemail, yes, but it is a work in progress. > > CDR and sipxconfig might not be avilable, but HA in its current state > > mostly means you can send/receive calls non-stop in the use case you > have. > > That's good news at least, it's a very important factor. > And it's already there. > > > You can have a single machine dedicated to just VM, and make that storage > > and system as redundant as possible from a hardware perspective.. > > Is this something which will change in the future? > > I'm sure if you look at the roadmap for 4.2, you will see a lot of forthcoming changes for VM. > > You can setup your gateway on both servers. > > I must have this out of context. I have one sipx box, two firewalls, can > only put one > gateway on sipx so need to be looking at the pfsense lb method. Is that > something you've > used, does it work well? > > Never done it. > > You can have a server dedicated to siptrunking if you > > That just seems to be the most efficient way in my mind at least. > > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
