On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:03 AM, M. Ranganathan <mra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Tony Graziano > <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > > I could see this in an instance where there are several offices in > dispersed > > geographic regions, even different countries. > > While all three might use the same ITSP, they might also have their own > > account. I would imagine that each office could set the other accounts up > in > > their system to handle least cost routing, but without dialing "through" > the > > remote offices sipx system itself. > > Yeah but that is not the question I am asking. The question is two > trunk gateway rulesfor the SAME ITSP account from the same ITSP provider. > > Use case : > > You may want to dial prefix 91 for non anonymous calling. Prefix 92 > for anonymous calling both using the same ITSP account. > > Is this something people care about? I think we are close to > convergence on 4785 and will probably be able to support it anyway. > > > So in that case I would "imagine" this might be needed by some. I'm just > > pulling this out of the air right now. > > BTW Ranga, nice shades! > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:34 AM, M. Ranganathan <mra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Currently sipx does not support multiple ITSP accounts with the same > >> domain too well. i.e. for outbound dialling there is not enough > >> information to pick the specific ITSP account to use. In trying to > >> address this limitation this we defined a line ID in issue xx-4785 to > >> be associated with an a trunk gateway. The line id is a unique > >> identifier associated with the trunk gateway gateway that gets copied > >> into the sipxbridge configuration file for a specific ITSP account. > >> But currently the solution for xx-4785 only allows a single a line ID > >> per ITSP account. > >> > >> In this context, we have been discussing the issue of Many to One > >> mappings from gateway to ITSP account. > >> > >> I would like to hear whether I am barking up the wrong tree when for > >> many-to-one support for this mapping. Perhaps nobody needs it -- in > >> which case I stand corrected in asking for this. > >> > >> So I request some help from you in determining this. ( i.e. do you see > >> a need for it ) ? Would you ever map more than one trunk gateway to > >> a given ITSP account? > >> > >> Thanks and regards, > >> > >> Ranga > >> > >> -- > >> M. Ranganathan > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > >> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > >> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > > > > > > > > -- > > ====================== > > Tony Graziano, Manager > > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > > > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > > > Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? > > Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec. > > > > > > > > -- > M. Ranganathan > +1
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
