Two accounts with the same domain name is not an issue, if you can terminate on different IP addresses rather than the Domain name. I suspect that Bandwidth.com has many termination points on their network to chose from?
For instance, with Broadvox, they have dozens of termination points to their network to chose from. Voip.MS has multiple points as well. With VOIP.ms you can terminate your main account at one address, and sub-accounts at a different one. It allows one bill, but different accounts, and different routes on their network. -----Original Message----- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 1:08 PM To: thod...@verizon.net; nwatk...@garrettcounty.org; mra...@gmail.com Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Many to one mappings an ITSP account from an SIP trunk Gateway. But 2 accounts with the same domain name is what is being addressed. ============================ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd Hodgen <thod...@verizon.net> To: 'Nathaniel Watkins' <nwatk...@garrettcounty.org>; 'Tony Graziano' <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>; 'M. Ranganathan' <mra...@gmail.com> Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> Sent: Tue Feb 23 16:04:38 2010 Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Many to one mappings an ITSP account from an SIPtrunkGateway. However, you can accomplish the same thing by having two separate accounts with Bandwidth.com, each have the same 5 trunks, and set your permissions for long distance on one, and local on the other. Seems a configuration change to the system to accommodate that scenario is better than making a software change that has limited value and use, and is probably better time used in adding other worthwhile features, fixes. From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Watkins Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:39 PM To: Tony Graziano; M. Ranganathan Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Many to one mappings an ITSP account from an SIP trunk Gateway. I would think this would be needed for the following scenario: Assume ½ of all calls are long distance the other ½ are local Using Bandwidth.com as an example: 5 unlimited trunks/5 metered trunks Long distance calls would want to use the unlimited trunks Local would want to use the metered trunks (since local doesnt cost anything) Im not sure if bandwidth.com will let you put metered and unlimited trunks and use its own lcr to do this for you? Nathaniel From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:58 AM To: M. Ranganathan Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Many to one mappings an ITSP account from an SIP trunk Gateway. On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:03 AM, M. Ranganathan <mra...@gmail.com> wrote: On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > I could see this in an instance where there are several offices in dispersed > geographic regions, even different countries. > While all three might use the same ITSP, they might also have their own > account. I would imagine that each office could set the other accounts up in > their system to handle least cost routing, but without dialing "through" the > remote offices sipx system itself. Yeah but that is not the question I am asking. The question is two trunk gateway rulesfor the SAME ITSP account from the same ITSP provider. Use case : You may want to dial prefix 91 for non anonymous calling. Prefix 92 for anonymous calling both using the same ITSP account. Is this something people care about? I think we are close to convergence on 4785 and will probably be able to support it anyway. > So in that case I would "imagine" this might be needed by some. I'm just > pulling this out of the air right now. > BTW Ranga, nice shades! > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:34 AM, M. Ranganathan <mra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Currently sipx does not support multiple ITSP accounts with the same >> domain too well. i.e. for outbound dialling there is not enough >> information to pick the specific ITSP account to use. In trying to >> address this limitation this we defined a line ID in issue xx-4785 to >> be associated with an a trunk gateway. The line id is a unique >> identifier associated with the trunk gateway gateway that gets copied >> into the sipxbridge configuration file for a specific ITSP account. >> But currently the solution for xx-4785 only allows a single a line ID >> per ITSP account. >> >> In this context, we have been discussing the issue of Many to One >> mappings from gateway to ITSP account. >> >> I would like to hear whether I am barking up the wrong tree when for >> many-to-one support for this mapping. Perhaps nobody needs it -- in >> which case I stand corrected in asking for this. >> >> So I request some help from you in determining this. ( i.e. do you see >> a need for it ) ? Would you ever map more than one trunk gateway to >> a given ITSP account? >> >> Thanks and regards, >> >> Ranga >> >> -- >> M. Ranganathan >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users >> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users >> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ > > > > -- > ====================== > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? > Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec. > > -- M. Ranganathan +1 _____ This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or entity named you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender, delete the original, and destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County Government therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission. Garrett County Government, 203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550 www.garrettcounty.org _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
