> I am curious as to whether the following "should" work in 4.2 > under the following: > > sipxecs > server<----firewall--->|Internet|<---firewall---><remote > branch, users: thing1 and thing2>
This is definitely a scenario that is working. Support for this kind of deployment was one of the major justifications for doing the far-end NAT traversal feature in the first place. I you can, I would be *very* interested in seeing the tcpdump output of your failing scenario. The 'tcpdump' command you need to run can be found in http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r0/Remote+User+NAT+Traversal (along with other troubleshooting and config tips). > > Should thing1 and thing2 be able to call each other? Setting > the media relay to aggressive did not seem to help. > > Has anyone been able to use it in a scenario as described > above? There is no SPI or ALG at the location where the > remote users are. All other functions (registration, media > services, vm, PSTN calls, etc., seem to work). > > -- > ====================== > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? > Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec. > > > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
