On 4/24/2010 7:58 AM, Scott Lawrence wrote: > > I'm not familiar with where that goes, but it should be possible to just > edit it into the files in a specific installation and test it - we don't > need to check anything in for that. > > I find lots of references to it, but no detailed explanation. I originally came across it when I was investigating the freeswitch high CPU utilization issue. I'll keep digging and see what I can find. I have a small deployment to do and they have a powerful VMWare ESXi box. I will give it a shot for that installation keeping in mind I can move it to a physical box in a few minutes if needed. Sorry about the Avaya question. You cleared that up since you said there is interest in making Sipx work better in a virtual environment. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMware?
Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:19:04 -0700
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMware? Tony Graziano
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMware? mkitchin . public
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMw... Tony Graziano
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and... Todd Hodgen
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMw... Todd Hodgen
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and... mkitchin . public
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2... Todd Hodgen
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMw... Scott Lawrence
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and... Tony Graziano
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2... Scott Lawrence
- Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2... Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)