Either you create the tunnel on pfsense or ...

The cisco routers are also on your private network, in which case add a
gateway and route on pfsense to use the cisco routers to connect those 2
sites.

No filters in pfsense should be needed in a vpn setting.
============================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431

Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427

Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

----- Original Message -----
From: Picher, Michael <mpic...@cmctechgroup.com>
To: Rhon <c4rdi...@gmail.com>; Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>;
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
Sent: Wed May 19 05:40:23 2010
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

I guess I don't understand your tunnel outside of the pfSense box.



Unless this diagram is inaccurate.



If you'd like to send be a visio or an true picture how this is
configured I might be able to help.



Mike



From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Rhon
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:17 PM
To: Tony Graziano; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site



Hi Everyone,

Here's a summary of what I did so far but still unable to resolve the
problems..

My network looks like this:

SITE A SIPX --> PFSENSE --> CISCO -->  |||| VIA GRE TUNNEL  |||| <--
CISCO <-- PFSENSE <-- SIPX SITEB

I use Cisco IPSEC GRE Tunnel for this purpose.

I set the pfsense to Manual Outbound NAT rule generation (Advanced
Outbound NAT (AON))

My NAT rules:
WAN        172.16.3.0/24       *      *      *      *      *     YES
(VLAN SUBNET)
WAN        172.16.1.0/24       *      *      *      *      *     YES
(PFSENSE/CISCO SUBNET)

Create 3 firewall rules in pfSense (FOR WAN/VLAN):

    * Action: Pass
    * Interface: WAN
    * Protocol: UDP
    * Source: any
    * Destination: WAN address
    * Destination port range: 5080

    * Action: Pass
    * Interface: WAN
    * Protocol: TCP/UDP
    * Source: any
    * Destination: WAN address
    * Destination port range: 5060


    * Action: Pass
    * Interface: WAN
    * Protocol: TCP/UDP
    * Source: any
    * Destination: WAN address
    * Destination port range: 30000 - 31000

I can connect via IPSEC GRE Tunnel and can route on each sites. I can
ring the phones but if you pickup you can't hear any voice but the call
remained connected. Tried to call IVR but no audio either.

My questions are:
1. Could this be a firewall problem? Any other ports to open in order to
establish the voice?
2. Is it required to pass gre protocol even if I have GRE tunnel
established?
3. I can establish a call using xlite on each site but not on a hard
phone.

I also made an ACL in cisco to open 5060(UDP/TCP) but it's no use.

I will greatly appreciate any inputs here.

Thank you in advance.

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Rhon <c4rdi...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Tony,

Here's my x-lite registration to sipx:

        "Rhon"<sip:2...@domain.com <mailto:sip%3a...@domain.com> >

<sip:2...@172.16.3.138:49328;rinstance=49bedde5bd36ec5d;x-sipX-nonat>


My setup passed the configuration test mentioned in the wiki. And are
working in my simulated setup.

Thanks



On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Tony Graziano
<tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote:

I would suspect dns.

If your xlite is registering via hostname instead of domain name, its a
dead
giveaway.

============================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431

Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
Fax: 434.984.8427

Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

----- Original Message -----

From: Rhon <c4rdi...@gmail.com>
To: Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>;
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>

Sent: Tue May 18 08:40:17 2010
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site

Hello Tony,

Thank you for your reply. I already have those settings set and are able
to
call site-to-site via x-lite at the moment.
For the sake of testing I allowed everything to PASS on the firewall but
that don't help either.

I followed your recommendation in allowing GRE protocol to any
destination
but still failed.

Any clue what's happening?

Thanks in advance.

Rhon

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Tony Graziano
<tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
> wrote:

> Again, since your connection is site-to-site and your vpn via ipsec is
> there, you need to ensure the ipsec is passing/allowing all tcp AND
UDP
> traffic between the two.
>
> Don't confuse things with bringing up pfsense since its not really
> involved
> here (I don't think).
>
> Re-read my post listing your five steps. Filow that. It will work.
> ============================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> <sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org>
> To: Picher, Michael <mpic...@cmctechgroup.com>;
> sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org>
> Sent: Tue May 18 08:09:29 2010
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Picher, Michael
> <mpic...@cmctechgroup.com>wrote:
>
> >  I guess it depends on what is creating that tunnel and where NAT
lives.
> >
> Cisco is creating the GRE tunnel.  From Cisco it goes to PfSense FW. I
> made
> NAT set to:
>
> *Automatic outbound NAT rule generation (IPsec passthrough)*
>
> I think NAT is not necessary since traffic is passing thru the GRE
Tunnel
> and not going out. You can correct me if I'm wrong here.
>
> Hoping for your usual response.
>
> Many thanks and have a nice day!
>
> Rhon
>
> >
> > Your diagram (to me) shows your PBX behind pfSense and then going
into
> > some
> > sort of Cisco device with a GRE tunnel between the Cisco devices.
So,
> > is
> > the PBX traffic really NAT'd?  Where does the Tunnel terminate?
Your
> > information is incomplete.
> >
> I don't think pbx traffic is NAT'd.  Here's my ip topology:
>
> SITE A:
> Cisco/PFSense subnet: 192.168.1.0
> Voice Subnet: 192.168.2.0
> Tunnel: 10.10.10.1
>
> SITE B:
> Cisco/PFSense subnet: 172.16.1.0
> Voice Subnet: 172.16.2.0
> Tunnel: 10.10.10.2
>
> > I assumed (maybe wrongly) that your PBX was behind the pfSense box
and
> > NAT'd.
> >
>
> I not sure how to test this. But please note that we can establish
> connection using X-Lite via site-to-site without problems. Connection
can
> be
> established on each sites flawlessly.
>
>
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> > sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Rhon
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2010 1:01 AM
> >
> > *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm using IPSEC GRE and pfsense interfaces have private IPs. should
I
> > still
> > need NAT for that matter?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Picher, Michael
> > <mpic...@cmctechgroup.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > It should be set to manual and yes.
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Rhon [mailto:c4rdi...@gmail.com]
> > *Sent:* Monday, May 17, 2010 9:33 AM
> > *To:* Picher, Michael; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > I have the static NAT port set to NO on pfsense.
> >
> > Also, to I have to enable NAT traversal on sipx?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Picher, Michael
> > <mpic...@cmctechgroup.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Static NAT port on the pfSense?
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> > sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Rhon
> > *Sent:* Monday, May 17, 2010 9:14 AM
> > *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
> > *Subject:* [sipx-users] No Voice/IVR on Site-to-Site
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a problem with our deployment with SipXecs 4.2 which was
> > installed
> > fresh using ISO build.
> >
> > We cannot hear anything on both sides but are able to connect and
can
> ring
> > the other end. Calling the IVR is ok but no audio as well.
> >
> > SITE A:
> > 100 - 199
> >
> > SITE B:
> > 200 - 299
> >
> > Everything passed using Configurations tests.
> >
> > Our networks are setup as seen below:
> >
> > SITE A SIPX --> PFSENSE --> CISCO -->  |||| VIA GRE TUNNEL  |||| <--
> CISCO
> > <-- PFSENSE <-- SIPX SITEB
> >
> > Any thoughts on what the problem could be?
> >
> > I have bypassed everything on the firewall at the moment.
> >
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Rhon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to