On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Tony Graziano <tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > i suppose it will probably have to change again. it was a lot of work for > those guys to get it done this far. > there may end up being a separate directory for testing (unstable) versus > stable, who knows this late at night?
Yes, the way it was setup, there was a symlink to latest stable and one magical day it will take you to a whole new major version. I thought that was drastic, folks would want a little more notice about major upgrades, but I guess I did take some liberty here. I'm happy to do implement on the consensus, I do not do very much maintenance on production systems. Right now, updates will get you bug fixes on a particular version until you re-download new repo file > it looks like you did an OS update from your results and not a sipx update! > glad it worked though. I often wondered what folks do here. The right thing to do is keep your system up to date, but in practice if it ain't broke (and it's protected by a firewall) leave it be. Anyone words of wisdoms here from anyone, I haven't had systems break on normal updates (including kernel updates) since i ran gentoo. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
